Wal-Mart avoids mass discrimination lawsuit | RetailDetail

Wal-Mart avoids mass discrimination lawsuit

The American Supreme Court has ruled against a “class action lawsuit” in the Wal-Mart discrimination case. Six women had filed a complaint against their employer, complaining that they had less chances of promotion and a lower salary, only because they are women.

 

No class action lawsuit

The Supreme Court did not acquit Wal-Mart of discrimination, but it decided that it is impossible to judge the working conditions of 1.6 million female employees in once case. It reversed the San Francisco Court of Appeals' decision, saying the plaintiffs have not proven that all these women underwent the same discrimination – which is their legal obligation in order to be able to start a class action lawsuit.

 

No 11 billion dollar fine

Had the Supreme Court ruled the class action lawsuit valid, the complaint would have applied to 1.6 million women – with the possibility of costing Wal-Mart 11 billion dollars (7.6 billion euro) in case of conviction. As the Supreme Court did not clear the discrimination charges, the case will continue about these six women only. It goes without saying that now the scope has been reduced from 1.6 million to six women, the pressure on Wal-Mart and the height of the possible fines (as well as the media attention in the US) will be significantly smaller.

 

The National Women's Law Center was very disappointed with the verdict, stating that “the Court has told employers that they can rest easy, knowing that the bigger and more powerful they are, the less likely their employees will be able to join together to secure their rights.”



The American Supreme Court has ruled against a “class action lawsuit” in the Wal-Mart discrimination case. Six women had filed a complaint against their employer, complaining that they had less chances of promotion and a lower salary, only because they are women.

 

No class action lawsuit

The Supreme Court did not acquit Wal-Mart of discrimination, but it decided that it is impossible to judge the working conditions of 1.6 million female employees in once case. It reversed the San Francisco Court of Appeals' decision, saying the plaintiffs have not proven that all these women underwent the same discrimination – which is their legal obligation in order to be able to start a class action lawsuit.

 

No 11 billion dollar fine

Had the Supreme Court ruled the class action lawsuit valid, the complaint would have applied to 1.6 million women – with the possibility of costing Wal-Mart 11 billion dollars (7.6 billion euro) in case of conviction. As the Supreme Court did not clear the discrimination charges, the case will continue about these six women only. It goes without saying that now the scope has been reduced from 1.6 million to six women, the pressure on Wal-Mart and the height of the possible fines (as well as the media attention in the US) will be significantly smaller.

 

The National Women's Law Center was very disappointed with the verdict, stating that “the Court has told employers that they can rest easy, knowing that the bigger and more powerful they are, the less likely their employees will be able to join together to secure their rights.”



Questions or comments? Please feel free to contact the editors


Belgian fund close to HEMA acquisition

09/05/2018

Belgian Core Equity holding is allegedly close to acquiring Dutch chain HEMA: a verbal agreement is apparently in place, all that is required are the signatures.

Walmart, not Amazon, will acquire Indian market leader Flipkart

07/05/2018

Despite Amazon’s attractive offer, Indian online retailer Flipkart has chosen for Walmart and (remarkably), Google owner Alphabet as the new owners of 75 % of Flipkart’s shares. The deal is said to be worth 15 billion dollar.

Alibaba's growth exceeds expectations

07/05/2018

Chinese retail group Alibaba has published better-than-expected quarterly results: turnover went through the roof, but its profit is under pressure because of increased investments.

Shareholders ‘not amused’ by Unilever CEO's wage increase

03/05/2018

One in three British Unilever shareholders voted against the company’s proposed remuneration plan. Investors in the Dutch part of the (currently) British-Dutch company will vote on the plan as well.

Macy's acquires New York-based concept store Story

02/05/2018

American department store chain Macy’s will acquire New York-based concept store Story. Founder Rachel Schechtman will become Macy’s’ “brand experience officer”.

RetailDetail Congress ‘The Future of Shopping’ had substance and style

27/04/2018

With six CEOs of major Belgian retailers, the 2018 edition of the RetailDetail Congress had an impressive line-up on stage the 26th of April.