Foodwatch versus Unilever verdict delayed until 5th October

Foodwatch versus Unilever verdict delayed until 5th October

A German judge has delayed the verdict in the case of German consumer-organisation Foodwatch against food giant Unilever until 5th October. Both organisations have been at war with each other since November 2011, when Foodwatch accused Unilever of not fully informing consumers about Becel pro.activ.

Phytosterol: side effects or no side effects?

The centre of the discussion are the possible negative side effects of phytosterols in Becel pro.activ. Consumer organisation Foodwatch demands that Unilever no longer withholds or denies this relevant information. The organisation wants the British-Dutch food concern to fully and honestly inform consumers about possible risks of phytosterols. The German heart foundation has stated to back these demands.

 

The Bundesinstitut für Risicobewertung has demanded that European provision authority EFSA objects the phytosterols to a thorough investigation again. Unilever keeps stating that up till now, there is no scientific proof of negative side effects and remains that phytosterols lower the cholesterol levels and possibly reduce the risks of heart and vascular diseases.

 

In November last year, the concern stated that Foodwatch was spooking the consumer with half-truths. Subsequently, the consumer organisation shifted to a higher gear and summoned Unilever Deutschland to court.

 

Misguiding marketing award

That was not the last battle between Foodwatch and Unilever:  last June, Foodwatch Netherlands organised the election for the product with the most misguiding marketing. Out of 19,000 participants, more than one third voted for Becel pro.activ, earning Unilever a landslide victory.

 

Last year, the food multinational had won that not so enviable honour as well, with Blue Band Goede Start Witbrood - according to Unilever a white bread with the same qualities as whole wheat bread. The group soon admitted defeat and dropped its misleading claim.

 

 

Translation by Sanne Raspoet

Questions or comments? Please feel free to contact the editors


Hunkemöller wants to conquer Switzerland

17/08/2017

Dutch lingerie chain Hunkemöller aims to open a chain of physical stores in Switzerland, after having already opened a Swiss web shop in September 2016. The first physical store will open its doors in October.

Shoe brand Bally put up for sale

16/08/2017

Austrian investment firm JAB Holding wants to sell Swiss shoe brand Bally, hoping to get at least 600 million euro. The same company sold shoe brand Jimmy Choo not too long ago, as it wants to focus on its food brands henceforth.

Crocs loses patent battle

14/08/2017

Shoe manufacturer Crocs has lost a patent court case revolving around the shoe’s design. According to the American Patent & Trademark Office (USPTO), another company has had a similar design for much longer.

Coolcat's losses compound

14/08/2017

Dutch fashion chain Coolcat, part of entrepreneur Roland Kahn’s group, has not managed to lower its losses in 2016. On the contrary: its losses grew more than 50 % compared to the year before.

Zalando's growth once again surpasses 20 %

10/08/2017

German Zalando has achieved its 20 % growth target for the second quarter, but just barely. It still forecasts a 20 to 25 % growth for its full fiscal year.

Gucci files lawsuit against Forever 21

09/08/2017

Fashion label Gucci has decided to file a lawsuit against fashion chain Forever 21 in the United States. The case revolves around several pieces of clothing, all with a blue-red-blue or green-red-green ribbon. 

Back to top